> > The whole issue of figures of merit, and which are the appropriate > ones, is a rather involved one. My suggestion is that we remove the > current FOM line from the table (rather than adding several others), > and adding lines for etendue and for suggested exposure time. > > For Pan-STARRS, I am quoting > > http://pan-starrs.ifa.hawaii.edu/public/widefield/survey_strategies.html > > for a ~30 second exposure time (depending on filter). Correct? That's the planned exposure time for the solar system and redder passbands. Exposure times for g, r will be somewhat longer to avoid any performance hit from read noise. > > Also, Nick, what is the effective aperture (including obscuration) of > the Pan-STARRS telescope? Is it indeed 1.8m? > The outer primary diameter is 1.8m, and in the current design the secondary + support obscures about 36% of this. That gives an effective clear diameter of 1.44m. Cheers, Nick LSST LSST LSST LSST LSST Mailing List Server LSST LSST LSST LSST LSST LSST LSST LSST This is message 238 in the lsst-general archive, URL LSST http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~dss/LSST/lsst-general/msg.238.html LSST http://www.astro.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/LSSTmailinglists.pl/show_subscription?list=lsst-general LSST The index is at http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~dss/LSST/lsst-general/INDEX.html LSST To join/leave the list, send mail to lsst-request@astro.princeton.edu LSST To post a message, mail it to lsst-general@astro.princeton.edu LSST LSST LSST LSST LSST LSST LSST LSST LSST LSST LSST LSST LSST LSST LSST LSST LSST