Apache Point Observatory 3.5m User's Committee Meeting *******************April 12, 1999********************** Attending: Michael Strauss, Rene Walterbos, Bruce Gillespie, Ed Turner, Jeff Brown, Chris Stubbs, Ed Kibblewhite, Alan Uomoto ********Differential Imaging Motion Monitor (DIMM):********** Stubbs: This is an instrument to measure intrinsic seeing on the site, built by Armin Rest of the University of Washington. It's a 8 or 10 inch telescope with a two-hole mask; one hole has a wedge on it to split the two images of a star in the focal plane. Take very short integrations of Polaris, and look at the differential motion of the two images, to get one point in the power spectrum of seeing; extrapolate to the free-air seeing. The data will be put onto the Web. The instrument will temporarily be located close to the all-sky camera. When the seeing gets much better than 1 arcsec, then one is limited by the dome seeing of the DIMM itself. This will be mitigated by finding a better location in the "airstream" for a permanent siting in the future. In any case, comparison with 3.5m allows one to determine, e.g., whether the degradation of images is due to instrinsic seeing, or a problem with focus. Check out the DIMM web site for more detail: http://www.astro.washington.edu/rest/dimm We are thinking about putting one of these into the dome itself. Stubbs plans a meeting with Gunn and Carr to discuss the upgrade of the DIS chips. **************Status of new top-end and secondary:************************* Ed Kibblewhite: I will report on progress on the top-end design at the next meeting. There is a possibility of sharing effort with the 2.5m people, who are thinking about further work on their top end as well. Alan Uomoto: The guy in charge of our secondary at Steward has been out of town for the last two weeks. He returns today, so we should know where things stand this afternoon. Some data on the surface structure function are available, but it hasn't yet been put in terms of PSF, Strehl ratio, etc. See the appendix for an e-mail from Uomoto about the secondary status. The plan is to install this new mirror during the August shutdown. ***************April engineering shutdown:************************ The main task is to motorize the rotation of the tertiary mirror. Once this is done, instrument changes between echelle and Naysmith will take only a few minutes. A slightly more modest schedule than original has been adopted, partly to accomodate a time-critical NMSU program: coordinated observations of Mars with the AOTF. Shutdown work will start 21 April, interrupted for a few days for the AOTF program. Shutdown starts again 26 April, and should be over May 5, if there are no unforeseen showstoppers or bad weather. One difficult thing will be getting a collimated beam into the echelle once this is done. ************Remote observing from non-VBNS sites:**************** The VBNS sites seem to have stopped complaining about internet performance to APO. But from other sites, especially Washington State, things are getting worse. Washington State is likely to get on vBNS soon. Turner: Having a SLIP-PPP connection as a backup is something we would always like to have. Stubbs: We can't guarantee decent internet connection to anywhere on the planet; our effort should be focussed on making the connectivity to our departments as good as it can be. Gillespie: We have relatively few people observing remotely from non-APO sites; often these observing sessions are problematic. People who are going to observe from a non-standard site should try things out a day or two in advance, to make sure that they can actually make the relevant internet connections. Turner: All user's committee members should confirm that they have SLIP-PPP modem capability in their observing room. The modem number is 505-437-6149. *****************Site report:********************************* Gillespie: At the last user's committee meeting, we reported an accident, involving the dome running into open hatch doors at the intermediate level. We were able to recover mechanically, although we lost one day of observing. We've ordered new doors with electronic switches so the building would not be able to move with the doors open. We've instituted some procedural changes (e.g., check-lists for opening the telescope), that should make this kind of accident less likely. We will have a external audited safety review for the observatory later in the year, jointly with the SDSS. Last month's minutes are approved. Next meeting: May 10, 12 noon. Appendix: (slightly edited) E-mail from Alan Uomoto about the status of the Secondary: Jim Burge reports that SOML needs to make one more measurement: locating the exact position of the optical center of the mirror. A final report will be delivered in about two weeks. I asked Jim to translate the mirror measurements into psf and/or encircled energy plots so we could get an idea of on-the-sky performance. He said he would and expected that our combination of primary and secondary would give us images far smaller than the seeing. The optical test setup will be dismantled shortly (~a couple of weeks) so if we want to test after installing a mounting part it would have to be done soon. It will also have to be scheduled through the SOML office since it requires removing the mirror from the cell to install the part and then reinstalling the mirror, a big task. Alan Uomoto April 12, 1999 APO APO APO APO APO Apache Point Observatory 3.5m APO APO APO APO APO This is message 347 in the apo35-general archive. You can find APO the archive on http://www.astro.princeton.edu/APO/apo35-general/INDEX.html APO To join/leave the list, send mail to apo35-request@astro.princeton.edu APO To post a message, mail it to apo35-general@astro.princeton.edu APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO