I've spent the past couple days trying to calibrate some GRIM photometry to published standard star magnitudes, and thought I would summarize my results here, both in hopes that they may be useful to others and that others who have done this exercise might comment on consistency of the results. Please note that is my first serious attempt at this game, and is based on relatively few standard star observations. <H3> Summary of results: </H3> For the night of 1996 April 29 (UT), I found the following based on observations of 5 standard stars in K', 3 in J, and 4 in 2.22 and 2.36 micron CO index filters: observed mK' = K - (22.209 +- 0.006) or mK' = K - (22.295 +- 0.017) + (0.061 +- 0.008) * X or mK' = K - (22.284 +- 0.015) - (0.022 +- 0.017)*(J-K) + (0.059 +- 0.007) * X and mJ = J - (22.985 +- 0.005) or mJ = J - (23.086 +- 0.009) + (0.068 +- 0.004) * X and m(2.36)-m(2.22) = CO + (0.309 +- 0.005) or m(2.36)-m(2.22) = CO + (0.259 +- 0.013) + (0.037 +- 0.006) * X Here K, J, and CO are tabulated in Elias et al (1982, AJ 87:1029), mJ, mK', etc are instrumental magnitudes defined as -2.5*log10(ADU/second), and X is the airmass of the observation. The counts are total counts for the star, measured in a big aperture. To get good agreement between counts from requested 1.5 and 3 second exposures, I found I had to assume true exposure times of (1.5 - 0.185) and (3 - 0.185) seconds. For 1995 December 11, a K band zero point based on one Elias standard gives mK' = K - (22.191 +- 0.007) and a CO index calibration gives m(2.36)-m(2.22) = CO + (0.373 +- 0.010) . I also took UKIRT standard observations on 951211, which are consistent with the above K band zero point at about the 2% level. (The faintest of three observed UKIRT standards, at K = 14, was discrepant at more like 10%.) So, the zero point was pretty consistent night to night in K' band, but appears not to have been in the CO index; I am not sure if that is indicative of true variations or of a problem with my calibration. Any feedback on whether these coefficients look reasonable would be appreciated. I also got some rather larger color and extinction coefficients, of order 0.2, for 951211 (on the basis of a less extensive color and airmass range than for 960429). I don't think they are right. The airmass corrections for 960429 are in essence based on a single standard observed at airmass ~ 3.8, and the K band color correction is similarly based on a single red standard (BD+3_2954). That star was not observed in J so no color term for mJ could be established reliably. The photometry was done in large software apertures around defocused images of bright standards. I didn't do a very careful job of aperture corrections and estimate ~ 1% errors in stellar photometry from that. I assumed 2% overall photometric errors for all stars, based on scatter among different exposures for the same star and filter. The coefficients were fit using the IRAF PHOTCAL package. <H3> Comments on the literature, finding charts, and other tools: </H3> I get my standard stars from the lists of Elias et al (AJ 87:1029, 1982, which defined the CIT standard system) and Casali & Hawarden (UKIRT/JCMT newsletter, August 1992, p. 33, which defines the UKIRT system and gives transformations from UKIRT to CIT magnitudes). I generally defocus the telescope by 300 to 500 focus steps before observing the Elias standards in broadband filters; otherwise they saturate the chip even in < 2 second exposures. The UKIRT standards don't require defocusing. Finding charts for Elias standards are rarely an issue (the standard is the brightest star around), though proper motions matter in some cases. I have written an MC Tcl script that will point the 3.5 meter to any of the Elias faint standards and take a 5 exposure sequence in a cross pattern; interested people may look at the source code which is available on Tycho.apo.nmsu.edu in /export/apotop/visitor1/peyton/dostan.tcl . The coordinates in that script have been modified for 44 years of proper motion (i.e. to 1994) in the handful of largest proper motion stars in the catalog. For UKIRT standards, a handy source of many finding charts is Landolt 1992, AJ 104:340. I was able to find charts for UKIRT faint standards numbers 3, 5-10, 12-14, 24-26, 29, 32, and 35, and there may be others (I did not do an exhaustive search). That article is available through the ADS Article server, too, so you can get postscript versions of these charts online. (Cf. http://adswww.harvard.edu/ .) K' band magnitudes for some Elias standards, plus a transformation from K' to CIT K magnitude, are given in Wainscoat and Cowie 1992 (AJ 103:332). I would be interested to hear about other reliable lists of near-infrared standard stars, and in particular about any fields containing a few reasonably well separated stars with a range of colors and well measured photometry on a standard system. -James Rhoads rhoads@astro.princeton.edu APO APO APO APO APO Apache Point Observatory 3.5m APO APO APO APO APO This is message 15 in the apo35-grim archive. You can find APO the archive on http://astro.princeton.edu:82/apo35-grim/INDEX.html APO To join/leave the list, send mail to apo35-request@astro.princeton.edu APO To post a message, mail it to apo35-grim@astro.princeton.edu APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO