Subject: APO 3.5-m Users Committee minutes 3/28/05
From: Bruce Gillespie
Submitted: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:45:29 -0600
Message number: 898
(previous: 897,
next: 899
up: Index)
APO 3.5-m Users Committee Phonecon, 3/28/05
Attending: Suzanne Hawley, Michael Strauss, John Bally, Fred Hearty,
Stephane Beland, Bruce Gillespie, Rene Walterbos, Don York
Absent: Al Harper, Russet McMillan, Karl Glazebrook, Bruce Balick, Jon
Holtzman
Minutes taken by Bruce Gillespie
**********************************
UVa and Triplespec NIR spectrograph:
Based on recent discussions with Bob Rood at UVa, Suzanne reported that
the situation there may develop quickly to a point where we may need to
discuss alternative arrangements with them to acquire the Triplespec
NIR spectrograph for the 3.5-m telescope. Suzanne would like to
confirm our users' potential interest in having Triplespec at APO in
order to proceed using a variety of paths in the negotiations. Michael
stated that Triplespec seems like a "wonderful thing" and that the
3.5-m telescope needs this instrument. He added that spectroscopic NIR
followup would be broadly useful, and in particular for QSOs and
brown-dwarf candidates identified by SDSS, plus for studies of unusual
objects such as white dwarfs and carbon stars.
Don asked when Triplespec could be on our telescope, and Suzanne said
probably some time next year. John asked what the estimated value of
the instrument was, and Suzanne replied around $1.2M. Don asked what
the resolving power would be, and John replied that it would be around
3000. Don then asked if it weren't true that everybody is building or
planning a NIR spectrographic capability for other telescopes, so in
order to justify it for our telescope we would need to propose a large
campaign-like program for it that could only be done at APO. Michael
pointed out that everybody has a DIS-like instrument at their
telescope, but our DIS is still the most-used instrument on our
telescope, even for small programs; Triplespec would be similarly
popular, in his opinion. Don then said that we need to determine the
detailed "useful" spectral regions that Triplespec would furnish, given
its resolution and contamination of the NIR spectrum by atmospheric
features. Michael Strauss said a web site where the IR spectrum lives
seems to be down right now, at a link off the UKIRT web site:
http://www.jach.hawaii.edu. Bruce said that it's possible that John
Wilson at UVa could furnish us with a simulated sample spectrum for our
purposes.
Don said the he thought it would be great, in general, for APO to have
Triplespec. However, his personal interest for NIR emission-line
spectroscopy would be largely satisfied better by the F-P in NIC-FPS,
when that becomes available. Rene stated that NMSU astronomers are
still interested in Triplespec, but that there is some concern about
the potential cost in telescope time. John added that CU is interested
in the long-slit capabilities of Triplespec, but they are also hoping
to use the F-P in NIC-FPS for much of their science programs. Fred
added that the F-P is not as useful for extra-galactic work as
Triplespec would be. Suzanne, speaking for UW, said that her users are
very interested in NIR spectroscopy, especially for stars.
Based on this discussion and other factors, Suzanne announced she will
talk to Bob Rood at UVa about alternative paths for ARC to acquire
Triplespec for the 3.5-m telescope.
**********************************
GRB status and plans:
Suzanne said that four ARC institutions submitted 3.5-m GRB ToO
proposals for Q2, designating 12 half-nights of time to compensate
bumped observing programs. We had two alerts in March, and were able
to get a NIR detection of an afterglow in K, H, J, and Z just last
week. These alerts also pointed out some "grey areas" in our
compensation policy for bumped observers, which will be sorted out and
clarified shortly. Suzanne asked the Users Committee members to look
at the GRB document which has been previously distributed to the
committee members, but remember that there is proprietary information
in the document--don't post it in a public place. Users should be
encouraged to read it, and get their comments back to committee members
and to their institutional representative of the ARC Futures Committee.
Rene mentioned that NMSU had some ideas about the GRB-alert
compensation policy, and which institutions should be charged for
alerts and compensation time, plus concerns about protecting scheduled
programs for thesis data. Suzanne said that the plan is to wait and
see how much GRB alert observing actually happens in the coming
quarter, and that institutions should use the schedule-protection block
in the observing proposals in compelling cases.
Don pointed out that Swift has announced that its alerts are going
public in early April. He has also heard that the VLT is gearing up
for an extensive queue campaign observing program for GRB alerts.
Suzanne pointed out that we will still have an advantage of fast NIR
and echelle response, plus our access to sky that the VLT cannot reach.
**********************************
Summer shutdown plans:
In the brief time remaining in the telecon, Suzanned mentioned that the
2005 schedule for CIF projects and various engineering maintenance work
on the telescope is somewhat fluid in the July through October time
frame; there will be more discussion on this in future meetings.
**********************************
Recent progress at the site:
Bruce G. reported that the new high-speed engineering camera (aka
FastCamII) has been rendered fully operational and has been recently
used to collect baseline data on image motion as part of the new
top-end rebuild project. Also, he announced that Fritz Stauffer has
accepted an offer to start on 18 April as the site's new Systems and
Network Administrator, and will work closely with Craig Loomis.
**********************************
Next phonecon will be on Monday, April 25, at 8:30 AM Pacific Time.
APO APO APO APO APO Apache Point Observatory 3.5m APO APO APO
APO
APO This is message 898 in the apo35-general archive. You can find
APO the archive on http://www.astro.princeton.edu/APO/apo35-general/INDEX.html
APO To join/leave the list, send mail to apo35-request@astro.princeton.edu
APO To post a message, mail it to apo35-general@astro.princeton.edu
APO
APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO