APO 3.5-m Users Committee Phonecon, 2/14/05 Attending: Suzanne Hawley, Michael Strauss, Karl Glazebrook, Bruce Balick, Bruce Gillespie, Rene Walterbos, Al Harper, Jon Holtzman Absent: Don York, Russet McMillan, Fred Hearty, John Bally Minutes taken by Bruce Gillespie ********************************** NIC-FPS status: Since Fred Hearty was in transit to APO and unavailable for this teleconference, the NIC-FPS status and plans report was mainly given by Suzanne and Bruce G. Bruce Balick asked about the availability of NIC-FPS user documentation. Bruce G. said that there was a message posted to apo35general from John Barentine that points to NIC-FPS documentation (see message 851 in the apo35-general archive). It was also pointed out that until all of the user documentation is in place, Fred Hearty has offered to help NIC-FPS users personally, both before and during their observing runs. Suzanne added that some of the ARC institutions now have one (or more) "seasoned" NIC-FPS users, and that new users could try consulting with them. She also pointed out that we have decided to allow NIC-FPS be used as a primary or backup instrument outside of the scheduled "campaign" schedule blocks, and that it will be treated as a normally scheduled instrument in Q2 (sans etalon). Also, Q2 will be the last quarter that GRIM2 is scheduled, so that users who need to transition their science programs from GRIM2 to NIC-FPS will need to plan according. There was some discussion of what to do with GRIM2 once it's retired. Since it is ARC property, one thought was to surplus the instrument to an ARC institution if anybody wanted it. Al Harper expressed possible interest for UC. The Fabry-Perot side of NIC-FPS is presently not working well enough for science, and will be worked on during the next several weeks. If this is unsuccessful, the F-P will be removed from the instrument and is not likely to be reinstalled until after the summer shutdowns. Also, the vacuum-hold problem we are presently experiencing with the instrument is going to be worked on during the summer, most probably in Boulder. ********************************** Gamma-Ray Burst programs: The GRB science document, being assembled by Don Lamb et al., will soon be available. Suzanne will pass it on to the users committee members and asked them to study it, share it with interested ARC astronomers, and give her feedback. It was mentioned that the forthcoming document should be treated as somewhat proprietary, i.e., don't post it in a public place. ********************************** Next Futures Committee meeting: The next Futures Committee meeting will be held in Boulder on 3-4 March. At the last meeting in Chicago, discussions included the UVirginia Triplespec instrument proposal. At the upcoming meeting, there will be a presentation by Jian Ge on the Florida extra-solar planet search proposal, and the committee will discuss the impacts and potential interactions between the 2.5-m and 3.5-m telescopes at APO. The Futures Committee will need to hear feedback from the community regarding this proposal and its potential impacts. Suzanne asked that the Users Committee members should talk to the Futures Committee members at their respective institutions, in cases where it's not the same person. She also mentioned that she had recently talked to George Jacoby about possible future collaboration with WIYN. Suzanne will discuss this with the Futures Committee next month. Michael added that the SDSS project will be at the NSF review of the extension proposal later this week. We are hoping to hear a decision from the NSF before 1 April. Rene said it would be useful to know the decision by the time of the Futures Committee meeting next month, but that it would be unlikely that we would hear anything by then. On another futures-related topic, Suzanne said that she would talk to Karl at the meeting about the JHU proposal for potential upgrades to DIS (see below). ********************************** Telescope & Instruments report: Bruce G. reported that the telescope and instruments have been working fairly well recently, although the weather has been unusually wet and cloudy. Suzanne mentioned that the new top-end CDR is tentatively scheduled for April, and that the new spare drive boxes are being constructed in Seattle; both are planned for installation this year. Bruce G. pointed out that with the uncertainty of SDSS-II, there has been (and possibly will be more) staff attrition at the site that affects both the 3.5-m and SDSS. Various contingency plans have, or will be, put in place to minimize the consequences of reduced staffing levels over the coming months, pending the outcome of the SDSS-II proposal. ********************************** DIS upgrade proposal: Since DIS is our most-used instrument, some CIF funds have been budgeted for enhancing its performance. Jon Holtzman is looking into this, and has identified three relatively minor upgrades to improve throughput: o new gratings (to improve throughput, and chip and wavelength coverage) o UV throughput (fixing the optics to allow throughput below 3900 Angstroms) o Dichroic split (to fix a dip in the throughput at the split between red and blue) Jon has asked the Instrument Development Group at JHU to make recommendations on how to do these improvements, and it would be good if Jon heard comments from DIS users about their grating parameter and wavelength preferences. Also, Suzanne mentioned that the red-fringing problem is being investigated, and wondered if anybody had solved it in reductions. Michael said that you need to take flats for every science exposure, but others doubted if this is enough. People with red data who either have problems with fringing and/or have solved the fringing problem are encouraged to contact their users committee representative and Jon Holtzman. Rene mentioned that doing velocity work in the blue is hard, because you need lots of light to get calibration lines, which shift as the instrument rotates. Also, scattered light in the blue side has been a problem for some. Jon said that one idea would be to have all three gratings mounted at the same time, with the low-res gratings mounted at a fixed angle in place of the imaging mirrors. He wondered if this would be a problem, and most agreed that it wouldn't because not many people ever use the imaging mirrors, and they could be installed in advance if someone did need to use them. Also, if all three turrets had gratings, doing slit-less spectroscopy would have the same caveats. ********************************** Other topics: Rene asked for a summary of the summer shutdown plans. Suzanne said that the plans are not exact yet, but we expect to have a one-week shutdown in June to replace the telescope drives, and two-week shutdowns in both July and August to do annual maintenance and install the new top-end. All shutdowns are being targeted for bright time. ********************************** Last month's minutes were approved without comment. Next phonecon will be on Monday, March 28, at 8:30 AM Pacific Standard Time. APO APO APO APO APO Apache Point Observatory 3.5m APO APO APO APO APO This is message 892 in the apo35-general archive. You can find APO the archive on http://www.astro.princeton.edu/APO/apo35-general/INDEX.html APO To join/leave the list, send mail to apo35-request@astro.princeton.edu APO To post a message, mail it to apo35-general@astro.princeton.edu APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO