Apache Point Observatory 3.5m User's Committee Meeting April 9, 2001 Attending: Bruce Gillespie, Paula Szkody, Ed Turner, Michael Strauss, Lew Hobbs, Jon Holtzman Unavailable: Alan Uomoto, Chris Stubbs, and Rene Walterbos *************RIVMOS IR instrument Jon Holtzman: This instrument ('The Rapid Infrared and Visible Multi-Object Spectrograph') is an IR camera and multi-object spectrograph that Bruce Woodgate of Goddard is building as a prototype for NGST. The idea is to develop a micro-shutter array in a cooled focal plane to make multi-slits on the fly. It uses a 1024X1024 InSb Aladdin, sensitive from 0.6-5 microns. Field of view on the 3.5m would be 6 arcmin. The design includes both an imaging mode (with 12 filter positions on the filter wheel), and three spectroscopic modes; R = 50, R = 2000, and R = 5000, the latter two with prism cross-dispersers. They are looking for telescope time for help in commissioning this instrument. They hope once it's developed, to mount it on its own telescope port (with its own guider and rotator, which presumably we would have to supply), to do fast follow-up of interesting transient objects, but initially, it would share the port with SPICAM and DIS (and thus share the rotator and guider). They hope to get this done within the next year or so. It has the potential to replace GRIM (although it is not guaranteed that it would stay here). Once we pay for the software, the guider, the rotator, and the cryogen system, this instrument may cost the observatory of order $250,000, although at this stage, the observatory has not committed to this yet. Holtzman and Gillespie are in the process of putting together a detailed description of the instrument, which will be posted to the web. ***************Writing CDROMs at the site Russett McMillan is hearing requests from some observers that data be written to CD-ROMs at the mountain and mailed to them. Is this something that we would like to support? It would take 15-20 minutes of extra work by the observing specialist. Another worry is that data might get lost in the mail. Also, there is always a possibility of making some mistake in the copying step. A question to the observing community: is this a high priority? Is this something that we would like? If no strong sentiment is heard from the users, the availability of this will be announced generally to the users, with the understanding that it is to be used sparingly and for compelling reasons only (e.g., problems with the internet connection). ***************Web based proposal form This would allow certain things to be automated, such as automated e-mail to people 48 hours before their observing time. It would also make Ed Turner's scheduling job much easier, if all the relevant information were formatted in a uniform way. Perhaps we will need a Phase I-Phase II approach as HST uses: apply for telescope time in the usual way, and then relevant information for accepted proposals are entered into the web form. It will of course be useful to the extent that we have a single form for users at all institutions. APO will make an attempt at such a form. *****************Summer shutdown It will be a shutdown of 4-6 weeks. A number of telescope house-keeping tasks will be carried out; the only major upgrade is installing the baffling that Jeff Morgan is designing. Realuminizing the tertiary, washing the primary, fixing the drive mechanism in the tertiary, pumping down all the instruments, and so on, are all on the task list. So what about the DIS upgrade? The problem is that Jeff Morgan, a key person on that, will be busy with the baffling, and both things simply can't be done at the same time. So perhaps we should take the DIS offline for one dark run (i.e., one month) for the upgrade, sometime before or after the shutdown. In the preparation for the DIS upgrade, a small chip was found on the edge of the Schmidt optics in the blue camera. This probably happened when the instrument was shipped in 1994. So perhaps we should replace the relevant piece of optics during the upgrade. The coating on these optics is at least part of the problem of the lack of ultraviolet throughput of the instrument. However, there may be other coatings in the instrument which limit the blue response as well, so replacing this may not completely solve the problem. In any case, the detectors/electronics upgrade is the highest priority, so that's what we'll do, independent of what's done on the optics. **********Observing statistics, 2001 First Quarter Remember that the seeing measurements listed in the night logs are listed only when the refocussing is done, which is not a real unbiased measurement. Russet and others have been going through old guider exposures, to measure this in a uniform way. However, the guider works off-axis, and so gives worse seeing than the on-axis numbers. The median seeing of the guider exposures is 1.15-1.25 arcsec, with the best images in the range of 0.7-0.8". We can probably subtract of order 0.2" from this to get the on-axis seeing. In this quarter, 39% of the time has been lost to bad weather. ************University of Colorado Discussions of them buying WSU's share are advancing. Current discussion is focussed on what their in-kind contribution might be. Last month's minutes are approved. Next meeting will happen on Monday, May 14, at 11:30 AM EDT APO APO APO APO APO Apache Point Observatory 3.5m APO APO APO APO APO This is message 500 in the apo35-general archive. You can find APO the archive on http://www.astro.princeton.edu/APO/apo35-general/INDEX.html APO To join/leave the list, send mail to apo35-request@astro.princeton.edu APO To post a message, mail it to apo35-general@astro.princeton.edu APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO