Apache Point Observatory 3.5m User's Committee Meeting December 9, 2002 Attending: Al Harper, Bruce Gillespie, Ed Turner, Michael Strauss, Rene Walterbos, Bruce Balick, Alan Uomoto, Jon Holtzman, Jon Morse, Don York Absent: Chris Stubbs Agenda: -Telescope Azimuth drive failure and repair -Results of the 11/26 Board of Governor's meeting -Plans for the ARC community meetings at the Seattle AAS **************Telescope Azimuth Drive************** As you probably have all heard, the telescope azimuth drives failed on us the weekend before last. They are close to being repaired. The cause of the failure is not clear. We use speed-reduction devices that reduce the drive motors' capstan speed by a factor of 100; these have preloads of 100-1000's of pounds. We've had troubles with these throughout; they are a maintenance nightmare, and each of the three drives (one on altitude, two on azimuth) has needed complete rebuilding every 2-3 years. This system is not in common use on modern telescopes. The failure could be caused if the telescope were to bump into something, such as the building (which indeed happens from time to time). In the process of this repair, we've just added limit switches between the telescope and building to try to prevent such collisions. We hope to get the telescope reassembled Monday/Tuesday, and on the sky Tuesday evening. Science observing could begin on the second half of Tuesday night, more likely Wednesday. We own a pair of direct-drive motors like the ones used in the SDSS telescope, which do not have speed-reducing mechanisms. These were built as engineering prototypes for SDSS and were briefly but unsuccessfully tried out on the 3.5-m telescope many years ago. We have been experimenting with these motors on the bench this past year, and they could conceivably be put in the telescope and made to work, since their bugs have already been worked out by the SDSS project. *****************Report to Board of Governors************************** Bruce Gillespie and Ed Turner presented their report at the BoG meeting on November 26. It included the usual routine reports of numbers of nights assigned to different institutions, fraction of time lost to weather, and so on. We had <2% of unscheduled downtime over the last year. It will be worse this next year, given the problems with the drives just discussed. The overall 2003 forecast, budget was up 2.1% over previous year, for a total of $1.294 million, which includes general site operations, "sinking fund" augmentation, capital improvement projects, ARC corporate expenses, and a small amount of income. The science highlights covered, among other things, a project led by Don York (and involving collaborators from Chicago, Hopkins, and Colorado), an echelle survey of highly reddened OB stars. FUSE was launched a few years ago; it observed 40 stars to look for molecular hydrogen absorption in reddened directions. The idea is to look for diffuse interstellar bands, and correlate those with the molecular hydrogen. It was found that the strong bands are associated only with atomic hydrogen. They also found a series of weaker bands correlated with C_2. 5-6 papers are in the works; this was based on 80 nights of observing over 3.5 years. This was doable both because of the large amounts of time on a large telescope, and because of the quality of the echelle. The imaging performance of the telescope is indistinguishable from the previous year: a median seeing of 1.18", with average deviation of 0.46". The best seeing is about 0.6-0.7" (all as measured off the guider, and is therefore a bit off-axis). We have understood that the major contribution of the telescope to the seeing is the decollimation effect, discussed in detail in previous user committee meetings. To really tie this down may require undertaking the new topend project. One possibility is to give the users the option of spending 1/2 hour of their time for redoing the collimation with a Shack-Hartman test, for those who need the absolute best image quality. The breakdown of usage of the instruments is as follows: 44% DIS 12% GRIM 20% SPIcam 15% Echelle 9% Visitor instruments (mostly Fabry-Perot) Note that the Goddard Fabry-Perot is open for use for the APO community. Don York reported that he has used the instrument remotely, but there is a fairly steep learning curve. He plans to distribute soon notes on the instrument and its usage. Stubbs et al are working on a lunar laser ranging experiment. They will be observing both during day and night, using small bits of time throughout the month to follow the Moon's orbit. Plans for 2003: We did not submit to the board a definite Capital Improvements Fund (CIF) plan for this term: there is uncertainty on which instrument projects are going forward, driven in part with uncertainties about which of the pending NSF proposals will go forward. Among the items that might be included in the CIF are: -The planned JHU/Chicago Near-IR Spectrograph -NIC-FPS -Upgrade to the Echelle detector -A simultaneous multi-color imager a la Stubbs -A new topend -Upgrading DIS optics to increase sensitivity in the UV -A variety of telescope engineering projects, including the baffling and software upgrades (both of which in fact are on-going. We could afford to fund 2-3 of these over the next year; hard decisions! This is an important topic for the AAS meeting discussion (see below). There were a set of strategic issues also discussed at the meeting: -Will the 3.5m remain a general purpose telescope, or a specialized niche telescope? York argued strongly that we lose our uniqueness and niche if we simply try to be a general-purpose telescope facility in the KPNO mold. To what extent are there large coherent scientific programs in mind for the next generation of APO instruments (including NIC-FPS and the near-IR spectrograph)? -How can we leverage CIF funds to get more instruments (matching funds, etc.)? The only way that has worked thus far seems to be via selling telescope time. -How we would deal with the 3.5m budget if SDSS shuts down? A rough estimate is that this would increase 3.5m operating costs by of order $200-300K, of the same order as the CIF budget. -Discussion of human resources limitations, that limit our ability to get projects done (often parallel projects we want to do both require the full-time attention of the same people). -Ed Turner has been director of the observatory for 7 years. He is considering stepping down at the end of his third three-year term. Thus one year from now, the board will want to start searching for a new director. There will be a formal announcement about this, but we hope to meet one or more times at the Seattle AAS meeting, to discuss the above questions, and to set priorities in the CIF. Among the possible times are: Monday (January 6) 11:30-2 Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday evenings (5-7 PM) A final piece of news: the DIS optics upgrade will start at the end of this week. Last month's meeting minutes are approved (although note that the date at the top of those minutes are incorrect!). Next meeting on Monday, January 13 at 11:30 AM East Coast Time. APO APO APO APO APO Apache Point Observatory 3.5m APO APO APO APO APO This is message 636 in the apo35-general archive. You can find APO the archive on http://www.astro.princeton.edu/APO/apo35-general/INDEX.html APO To join/leave the list, send mail to apo35-request@astro.princeton.edu APO To post a message, mail it to apo35-general@astro.princeton.edu APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO