Apache Point Observatory 3.5m User's Committee Meeting December 13, 1999 Attending: Jeff Brown, Lew Hobbs, Jon Holtzman, Bruce Gillespie, Ed Turner, Michael Strauss Not attending: Alan Uomoto, Chris Stubbs. Agenda: Status of the shutdown Issues from the report to the Board of Governors ***********************Status of telescope****************************** Turner, Gillespie: As of Friday, things were being reassembled; ready to go on the sky for engineering Saturday or Sunday night, and going into Science operations on the 17th. These delays, to improve the secondary support system in light of the problems with the Sloan secondaries, have led to an intense engineering effort. Unfortunately, the use of piezo-electrics as pressure sensors (to feed limit switches), has failed for a whole variety of reasons. There was also hope to use piezos for the fast tip-tilt; it remains unclear whether or not this will work. But mechanical hardstops, and galil box controllers, have all been put in the redesigned secondary support system, which should make things quite a bit safer than they were before. As of Monday, December 13, the telescope is back together. Unfortunately, one of the encoders on the tertiary is not functioning; they are trying to figure this out now. Given that the telescope has been down for four months, it is likely that we'll find a number of such minor glitches as we try to get back on the air. Luckily, the weather for tonight, and indeed, the rest of the week, is likely to be good. [EDITOR'S NOTE: The encoder problem has now been fixed; the telescope actually did do engineering tests on the sky last night (i.e., the night of Monday, December 13).] What are we doing for December 31, Y2K problems and all that? Note that in unusual circumstances (e.g., power outages, network going down due to the millenium bug), the observatory is happy to do service observing (i.e., by phone, with finding charts, written instructions, etc.). Turner will post a note to apo35-general describing the shutdown history: why it has been so long, and why it has been extended so many times. Briefly, the cracks in the primary were discovered just as we were coming out of the usual August shutdown; once we were on top of this, the problems with the SDSS secondary came to light, which made us seriously concerned for the safety of our secondary. The risk to the secondary is much diminished now, but not completely negligible. There has been great progress in getting a final secondary support design for the SDSS; we hope to use these ideas in the new secondary top end, to be built over the summer. It would have been great if we could have used this downtime to do much-needed work on the instruments (especially the DIS upgrade). Part of the problem is that many of the same people who would work on the instruments were working full-time on the telescope itself. Also, we didn't know at the beginning how long the shutdown would be, making it difficult to make plans for work on the instruments. It is worth saying that the delays in getting the telescope back on line are *not* due to people being distracted by the Sloan problems; the people paid to work on the 3.5m have indeed been working full-time on the 3.5m. Under normal circumstances, in working on any major engineering task like that we've been tackling, we would first do all relevant preparatory work while the telescope was still running. Unfortunately, given the emergency faced here, this was clearly not possible, which is one reason the telescope has been down for so long. One piece of good news: the telescope with the new secondary did observe the sky on a single night in late October. Jeff Morgan has analyzed the Shack-Hartman data taken; it implies that the telescope should be able to deliver 0.5" images. Although the exact calibration of this number is a bit uncertain, it is clear that it is several tenths of an arcsec better than it was with the old secondary. ***************************************************************************** Presentation to the ARC Board of Governors Viewgraphs may be found at website: http://www.apo.nmsu.edu/Telescopes/1999_bog_report/1999_bog_report_35m_I.html Interesting plots/viewgraphs: -Number of APO publications as a function of time; a rapid increase recently! -DIMM measurements of local seeing for a typical night. -Weather statistics, individual institution usage statistics. This leads to a discussion of observing efficiency, and how one measures this. -Detailed diagrams about the cracks in the primary mirror. -Was the image image quality poorer in 1999 than 1998? Might this be due primarily to poor weather? Known problems with the primary support system (which have since been fixed)? DIMM should allow us to quantify this better. -Shack-Hartmann diagrams for the new and old secondary. -Hours of usage of each instrument. -Summary of status of 3-year plan. -Lists of published papers. Note the official acknowledgements that should be included in any 3.5m paper: "Based on observations obtained with the Apache Point Observatory 3.5-meter telescope, which is owned and operated by the Astrophysical Research Consortium" The BoG approved the budget as requested. In particular, they approved funding the next round of engineering tasks/improvement plans for the observatory. They did not approve funding for the aluminizing facility, but encouraged us to explore creative financing arrangements for it. There is some concern that site-wide issues (telephone systems, observatory vehicles), shared between the 3.5m and the SDSS, are falling between the cracks. Note that we don't have any major shutdowns planned over the next two quarters. Agenda items for next meeting from Jon Holtzman: Status of the DIS upgrade: how are we going to make it move ahead? Will it include an optics upgrade? The UV throughput upgrade? A new camera for the DIS slitviewer? Discussion of improving observing efficiency. Previous month's minutes are approved. The next meeting will be held on January 10 at 11:30 AM East Coast Time. APO APO APO APO APO Apache Point Observatory 3.5m APO APO APO APO APO This is message 399 in the apo35-general archive. You can find APO the archive on http://www.astro.princeton.edu/APO/apo35-general/INDEX.html APO To join/leave the list, send mail to apo35-request@astro.princeton.edu APO To post a message, mail it to apo35-general@astro.princeton.edu APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO APO